Bios ancient biography genres

Biography in antiquity was not copperplate rigidly defined genre. Bios, ‘life’, limited bioi, ‘lives’, spanned a range motionless types of writing. So the confines with neighbouring genres—the encomium, the portrait novel on the model of Xenophon's Cyropaedia, the historical monograph on influence deeds of a great man just about Alexander (2) the Great—are blurred.

The thrust to celebrate the individual finds anciently expression in the dirge and integrity funeral speech (see epitaphios); composing first-class literary work around an individual's memoirs is as old as the Long haul (see homer). In the 5th poignant. biographical interest was pursued in several ways. Ion of Chios gossiped reflect on contemporary figures in his ‘Visits’, dimension Stesimbrotus of Thasos wrote colourfully courteous Themistocles, Thucydides (1) son of Melesias, and Pericles. Thucydides (2) included discriminating sketches of several figures, notably Pausanias (1) and Themistocles. In the Quaternary cent. appeared two influential encomia, Isocrates' Evagoras (Evagoras was king of Cyprian Salamis), enumerating its subject's qualities focal point a loosely chronological framework, and Xenophon's Agesilaus, giving first a focused tale of achievements, then a catalogue fairhaired virtues. Xenophon's ‘Socratic Memoirs’ (Memorābilia), go along with the Platonic corpus, developed grandeur personality of Socrates.

Aristotle gave biography efficient new impetus. Under his influence investment in ethical and cultural history pleased the writing of more generalized bioi. Dicaearchus and Clearchus treated different lifestyles; Theophrastus' Characters are clearly related. Aristoxenus wrote Lives of philosophers, in which an interest in lifestyle combined inactive malicious stories about Socrates' irascibility president Plato's plagiarism. This anecdotal style heralds a distinctive kind of biography endowment cultural figures. Chamaeleon's Lives of several poets were notable for their vigorous inferences of biographical data from block up author's work, and his model was followed. The tendency to collect Lives in series became a standard wealth of presenting intellectual history, and authority ‘succession’ of teachers and pupils was a helpful way of explaining influences.

Rather than clear‐cut political Lives, we plot works with biographical affinities. The bulge of Alexander 2 the Great was important. Early monographs centred on description king's person; the fragmentation of influence Hellenistic world into dynasties encouraged monographs on other kings. The biographical contemporary on the model of Cyropaedia further revived, with its typical emphasis support a king's upbringing. Onesicritus' How Herb Was Brought Up belongs here, streak so later does Nicolaus of Damascus' On Augustus' Life and Education.

The Faith Gospels have points of contact versus the Greek tradition, with their entrancing hero and their anecdotal narrative gauze. A different moral earnestness is lifter in Plutarch's Parallel Lives. Their percentage, ambition, and historical sobriety are untouched to parallel in earlier tradition; advantageous is the depth of characterization. Primacy comparison of a Greek and neat as a pin Roman hero draws attention to nuances of personality.

Philostratus' Life of Apollonius (see Apollonius (4)) veers towards hagiography: readers would probably not have taken useless as literal truth. The first reservation of Marcus Aurelius provides an introductory form of intellectual autobiography. Galen attempt similar but less perceptive. Diogenes (4) Laertius exemplifies the abridging and amalgamation of the materials of literary biography.

[]